Page 253 - Leap of Faith Vol - 2
P. 253

Electoral Reforms – Way Forward  Chapter 11





                                                             The  Second  Administra ve  Commission  in  its  Fourth
              BAR  ON  CONTESTING  FROM  TWO  SEATS          Report viz. Ethics in Governance (2007) suggests that the
              Under Section 33 (7) of the Representation of the People Act,   previous  decade  had  witnessed  more  poli cal  reforms
              1951 a person can contest a general election or group of bye-  than any other large democracy a er World War II (P.9).
              elections  or  biennial  elections  from  a  maximum  of  two   Not  every  poli cal  reform  it  describes,  is  an  electoral
              constituencies. e Sub-section 7 was introduced through an   reform, and not every electoral reform in its list requires
              amendment in 1996, prior to which there was no bar on the   statutory enactment. Jus ce Ajit Prakash Shah (Retd) in
              number  of  constituencies  a  candidate  could  contest  from.   his Law Commission's 255  Report (2015), on the other
                                                                                    th
              However, Section 70 of the 1951 Act - read with Article 101   hand,  was  not  sa sfied  with  the  outcome  of  the
              and 101 (2) of the Constitution of India- specifies that a person
              elected to more than one seat can retain only one and resign   recommenda ons  of  the  aforesaid  Commissions/
              from the rest. In 2004, Election Commission of India proposed   Commi ees.  “Unfortunately”,  the  Report  states,  “their
              an  amendment  of  Section  33  (7)  to  provide  that  a  person   recommenda ons were not followed by legisla ve ac on,
              cannot contest more than one seat at a time. However, as an   required for enhancement of the quality of democracy, by
              alternative it said, if the existing provisions were to be retained,   reducing the influence of money and media in poli cs and
              a candidate contesting from two-seats should bear the cost of   ensuring free and fair elec ons” (P.2).
              bye-election to the seat that contestant decides to vacate in the
              event  of  him/her  winning  both  seats.  e  Chief  Election   Judicial interven ons have also played a significant role in
              Commissioner Rajiv Kumar has recently reaffirmed this stand.   furthering the electoral reforms, especially in the last two
                                                             decades. The Hon'ble Supreme Court's order dated May 2,





























            Sukumar Sen Hall at ECI Headquarters, Nirvachan Sadan, New Delhi


                                                                                                               235
   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258